Re-elect Sharon Thomas

September 30, 2009

ARRA money meant to shore up sagging state budgets

ALBUQUERQUE—New Mexico’s $3.4 billion share of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) money is being spent exactly as it was intended—namely to help fill the state’s budget shortfall, healthful according to a New Mexico advocacy group. In fact, more info states have very little wiggle room in terms of how the money can be spent.

“The ARRA money was intended to help with the budget deficits that so many states are facing, health ” said Gerry Bradley, Research Director for New Mexico Voices for Children. “The idea was to stave off drastic spending cuts in health care, public safety and education, because those cuts would lead to big job losses.

“The public perception seems to be that most of the funding would go toward construction, and that we’d see this boom in construction jobs, but that category was slated to receive just one-twelfth of the money,” Bradley added. A significantly higher percentage of the ARRA money was slated for Medicaid and K-12 education. The spending categories are laid out in a report the child advocacy group released in August.

While the ARRA has averted more drastic state-level cuts across the nation, it is only a short-term fix. “The federal money will go away but, unless we raise new revenue, our deficits will not. Thirty-two states have already passed legislation to raise new revenue. Hopefully, New Mexico will follow suit.”

The report, “New Mexico’s Economy and the Recovery Act of 2009,” is  is available online at: www.nmvoices.org

By Steve Klinger

Let’s see. So Max (Bought and Paid For) Baucus led five Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee in voting against a public healthcare option today, medicine
defeating the first of two proposals in committee, 15-8. Chairman Baucus has said he doesn’t support a public option because he feels it won’t pass the full Senate due to Republican opposition.

I’m not a mathematical genius, but it seems to me that if Democrats vote against the public option then Baucus is absolutely right: it won’t pass. But not because of Republicans, Butthead. (I hope the other turncoats on Senate Finance are listening. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Tom Carper (D-Del.) – that means you!)

With a de facto 60-40 majority, Democrats could pass health reform with a public option, and there are several ways to do it. If they voted in unity they would block a filibuster and then easily pass the measure with a simple majority. Even if the half dozen or so Democrats who either oppose or are politically uncomfortable with a public option would simply vote for cloture (to move the issue to an up-or-down vote) and then vote against it later, the public option would pass. A more difficult path, through reconciliation, would also be possible for budget-related aspects of the bill, since it too requires only a simple majority.

But Baucus, who has received over a million dollars in campaign contributions from Big Pharma and Big Insurance, won’t even come clean about why he really opposes the public option. Bad enough you have sold this country down the river, Beavis; at least own up to it. And please don’t insult our intelligence by arguing that you’re voting against it because it won’t pass. No, Butthead, it won’t pass because you and yours are voting against it. If you showed some leadership it would pass. But then we might prove ourselves dangerously closer to a democracy – an intolerable notion, if you’re a corporatist in 21at-century America.
By Steve Klinger

Let’s see. So Max (Bought and Paid For) Baucus led five Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee in voting against a public healthcare option today, information pills
defeating the first of two proposals in committee, health
15-8. Chairman Baucus has said he doesn’t support a public option because he feels it won’t pass the full Senate due to Republican opposition.

I’m not a mathematical genius, order but it seems to me that if Democrats vote against the public option then Baucus is absolutely right: it won’t pass. But not because of Republicans, Butthead. (I hope the other turncoats on Senate Finance are listening. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Tom Carper (D-Del.) – that means you!)

With a de facto 60-40 majority, Democrats could pass health reform with a public option, and there are several ways to do it. If they voted in unity they would block a filibuster and then easily pass the measure with a simple majority. Even if the half dozen or so Democrats who either oppose or are politically uncomfortable with a public option would simply vote for cloture (to move the issue to an up-or-down vote) and then vote against it later, the public option would pass. A more difficult path, through reconciliation, would also be possible for budget-related aspects of the bill, since it too requires only a simple majority.

But Baucus, who has received over a million dollars in campaign contributions from Big Pharma and Big Insurance, won’t even come clean about why he really opposes the public option. Bad enough you have sold this country down the river, Beavis; at least own up to it. And please don’t insult our intelligence by arguing that you’re voting against it because it won’t pass. No, Beavis, it won’t pass because you and yours are voting against it. If you showed some leadership it would pass. But then we might prove ourselves dangerously closer to a democracy – an intolerable notion, if you’re a corporatist in 21at-century America.
By Steve Klinger

Let’s see. So Max (Bought and Paid For) Baucus led five Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee in voting against a public healthcare option today, vitamin
defeating the first of two proposals in committee, 15-8. Chairman Baucus has said he doesn’t support a public option because he feels it won’t pass the full Senate due to Republican opposition.

I’m not a mathematical genius, but it seems to me that if Democrats vote against the public option then Baucus is absolutely right: it won’t pass. But not because of Republicans, Butthead. (I hope the other turncoats on Senate Finance are listening. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Tom Carper (D-Del.) – that means you!)

With a de facto 60-40 majority, Democrats could pass health reform with a public option, and there are several ways to do it. If they voted in unity they would block a filibuster and then easily pass the measure with a simple majority. Even if the half dozen or so Democrats who either oppose or are politically uncomfortable with a public option would simply vote for cloture (to move the issue to an up-or-down vote) and then vote against it later, the public option would pass. A more difficult path, through reconciliation, would also be possible for budget-related aspects of the bill, since it too requires only a simple majority.

But Baucus, who has received over a million dollars in campaign contributions from Big Pharma and Big Insurance, won’t even come clean about why he really opposes the public option. Bad enough you have sold this country down the river, Beavis; at least own up to it. And please don’t insult our intelligence by arguing that you’re voting against it because it won’t pass. No, Butthead, it won’t pass because you and yours are voting against it. If you showed some leadership it would pass. But then we might prove ourselves dangerously closer to a democracy – an intolerable notion, if you’re a corporatist in 21at-century America.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair John Kerry and Environment and Public Works Committee Chair Barbara Boxer today are expected to
introduce the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act.

“This bill is a good beginning, visit this
” said Kim McMurray, and
clean energy
associate with Environment New Mexico. “It is the first of many steps
toward a cleaner, healthier, and safer world.”

A major strength of the bill, according to Environment New Mexico, is
that it preserves and builds on the Clean Air Act’s protections, which
will enable America to move to wind, solar, and other clean energy
technologies by requiring the nation’s fleet of old and inefficient
coal-fired power plants to eventually meet modern air pollution standards.

In addition, the bill also improves on legislation passed by the House
in June by aiming to cut global warming pollution from large polluters
20 percent by 2020. This comes just a week after the release of a
sobering United Nations report concluding that the impacts of global
warming are arriving faster than the world’s scientists had predicted
just two years ago.

“Over the next few weeks, months, and years, we will need to do much
more to capture the full potential of clean energy,” said McMurray. “But
this year begins the race to transform our energy system and avoid the
worst impacts of global warming.”

Environment New Mexico applauded Senator Udall for his leadership and
hard work in crafting this bill.

“We look forward to working with Senator Udall to pass a bill that
creates millions of clean energy jobs, makes America more energy
independent, and cuts pollution fast enough to stave off the worst
effects of global warming,” said McMurray.

Environment New Mexico’s analysis of the House-passed energy bill is
available here:
http://www.environmentamerica.org/news-releases/global-warming-solutions/global-warming-solutions/america-poised-to-turn-the-corner-on-global-warming
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair John Kerry and Environment and Public Works Committee Chair Barbara Boxer today are expected to
introduce the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act.

“This bill is a good beginning, disorder
” said Kim McMurray, purchase
clean energy
associate with Environment New Mexico. “It is the first of many steps
toward a cleaner, buy information pills
healthier, and safer world.”

A major strength of the bill, according to Environment New Mexico, is
that it preserves and builds on the Clean Air Act’s protections, which
will enable America to move to wind, solar, and other clean energy
technologies by requiring the nation’s fleet of old and inefficient
coal-fired power plants to eventually meet modern air pollution standards.

In addition, the bill also improves on legislation passed by the House
in June by aiming to cut global warming pollution from large polluters
20 percent by 2020. This comes just a week after the release of a
sobering United Nations report concluding that the impacts of global
warming are arriving faster than the world’s scientists had predicted
just two years ago.

“Over the next few weeks, months, and years, we will need to do much
more to capture the full potential of clean energy,” said McMurray. “But
this year begins the race to transform our energy system and avoid the
worst impacts of global warming.”

Environment New Mexico applauded Senator Udall for his leadership and
hard work in crafting this bill.

“We look forward to working with Senator Udall to pass a bill that
creates millions of clean energy jobs, makes America more energy
independent, and cuts pollution fast enough to stave off the worst
effects of global warming,” said McMurray.

Environment New Mexico’s analysis of the House-passed energy bill is
available here:
http://www.environmentamerica.org/news-releases/global-warming-solutions/global-warming-solutions/america-poised-to-turn-the-corner-on-global-warming
viagra
Helvetica, doctor
Arial;”>


New Foods will Provide Better Nutrition to Mothers and Children

(Las Cruces) – Starting October 1, malady
the New Mexico Department of Health’s Women, Infants and Children (WIC) food packages will change to better reflect individual preferences and help families maintain a healthy and balanced diet. This is the first change to the WIC food package since the program began 35 years ago.

With the new food package, families will be able to use their WIC benefits to buy fresh fruits and vegetables, legumes, tofu, soy milk, baby food and whole grain foods that include tortillas, bread, oatmeal, brown rice and barley. The WIC program will also increase the amount of food provided to mothers who exclusively breastfeed their babies to better promote and support the establishment of successful long-term breastfeeding. The federal government adjusted the food package to provide more appropriate levels of nutrition.

“The new food packages reflect better nutritional standards for mothers and children and are a welcomed addition to the WIC program, ” said Health Secretary Alfredo Vigil, MD. “We’re confident that WIC families will be able to enjoy a wider choice of foods as they improve their nutritional intake. ”

WIC is a federally funded nutrition and education program that makes supplemental food available to pregnant and breastfeeding women, infants and children up to five years of age. WIC offices around the state provide one-on-one and group counseling and education sessions for mothers interested in breastfeeding. The WIC program serves approximately 67,000 mothers and children every month.

The current foods that can be purchased with WIC benefits are eggs, cheese, beans, lentils, cereal, milk, juice, infant formula, infant cereal, tuna and carrots for exclusively breastfeeding women. All current foods will still be part of the WIC food package, but there will be a reduction in the amount of juice, eggs, cheese, and infant formula that can be purchased.

The WIC EBT system that was launched in 2007 has been enhanced to ensure the new food products will be recognized. However if clients experience difficulty in purchasing some of the new food items, they are encouraged to contact the WIC Program Office so the problem can be corrected.

For more information about WIC, to find an office in your area, or to report a problem purchasing the new foods, call 1-866-867-3124 or go online to www.nmwic.org <http://www.nmwic.org/> .

# # #


bronchi
Helvetica, buy Arial;”>


New Foods will Provide Better Nutrition to Mothers and Children

(Las Cruces) – Starting October 1, the New Mexico Department of Health’s Women, Infants and Children (WIC) food packages will change to better reflect individual preferences and help families maintain a healthy and balanced diet. This is the first change to the WIC food package since the program began 35 years ago.

With the new food package, families will be able to use their WIC benefits to buy fresh fruits and vegetables, legumes, tofu, soy milk, baby food and whole grain foods that include tortillas, bread, oatmeal, brown rice and barley.  The WIC program will also increase the amount of food provided to mothers who exclusively breastfeed their babies to better promote and support the establishment of successful long-term breastfeeding.  The federal government adjusted the food package to provide more appropriate levels of nutrition.

“The new food packages reflect better nutritional standards for mothers and children and are a welcomed addition to the WIC program,” said Health Secretary Alfredo Vigil, MD. “We’re confident that WIC families will be able to enjoy a wider choice of foods as they improve their nutritional intake.”

WIC is a federally funded nutrition and education program that makes supplemental food available to pregnant and breastfeeding women, infants and children up to five years of age.  WIC offices around the state provide one-on-one and group counseling and education sessions for mothers interested in breastfeeding. The WIC program serves approximately 67,000 mothers and children every month.

The current foods that can be purchased with WIC benefits are eggs, cheese, beans, lentils, cereal, milk, juice, infant formula, infant cereal, tuna and carrots for exclusively breastfeeding women.   All current foods will still be part of the WIC food package, but there will be a reduction in the amount of juice, eggs, cheese, and infant formula that can be purchased.

The WIC EBT system that was launched in 2007 has been enhanced to ensure the new food products will be recognized. However if clients experience difficulty in purchasing some of the new food items, they are encouraged to contact the WIC Program Office so the problem can be corrected.

For more information about WIC, to find an office in your area, or to report a problem purchasing the new foods, call 1-866-867-3124 or go online to www.nmwic.org <http://www.nmwic.org/> .

# # #


Mr. James W. Harbison,
a candidate for District 6 City Councilor, buy cialis has a totally simplistic and unrealistic view of local government. One of his main concerns is the “terrifying government control over private enterprise and an apparent disregard for the rule of law.” This is his quote that he listed on the extremist group “Patriotic Resistance” website.  He believes that “Public safety is the essence of government.”  He stressed that the Las Cruces budget should emphasize public safety over all other matters.  Then he claims he has the business experience as a retired training manager to work on revamping the whole city budget.

A responsible City Councilor needs to be concerned about other issues besides public safety.  There are public finance, transportation, infrastructure, housing and community development, technology and communications, youth activities, families, education and economic opportunities.  This is why  we have an outstanding City Councilor Dr. Sharon Thomas in District 6 .  She addresses all these issues and listens to her constituents to solve real problems.  She represents all the neighbors in District 6 and gives a fair hearing to all groups.

The special interests are criticizing Dr. Thomas for her opposition to their requests for extraordinary treatment which in many cases is not for the good of Las Cruces and its residents.  That is why they are bankrolling political shenanigans against her and supporting their selected “yes man” – Mr. Harbison.  As former President Teddy Roosevelt stated: …  “the great special business interests too often control and corrupt the men and methods of government for their own profit. We must drive the special interests out of politics..”

That is why voters should support Dr. Sharon Thomas.  She focuses on the whole community and does not act as an agent for the special interest groups.

Greg Lennes,

Las Cruces

Next Page »

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.