<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trolling for Assassins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grass-roots-press.com/2009/11/17/trolling-for-assassins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grass-roots-press.com/2009/11/17/trolling-for-assassins/</link>
	<description>A progressive, alternative source of news and commentary in southern New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.grass-roots-press.com/2009/11/17/trolling-for-assassins/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grass-roots-press.com/?p=2434#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>Not at all, Barb. Just that we shouldn&#039;t lose sight of how much worse things could get if we allow the right wing fundamentalists to foment some kind of coup or revolution because we&#039;re preoccupied with criticizing Obama.  I feel the system is rigged, and while he could and should (and we should push him to) be stronger and show more leadership on torture, climate change, Wall Street corruption, escalating wars especially, we know there are limits on what any president of this corporate-run government will be &quot;allowed&quot; to do. 

I don&#039;t agree by a long stretch with those who say he is as bad as Bush. The federal agencies, which had grown incredibly corrupt under GWB, are finally starting to function and regulate a little bit, which directly affects people&#039;s lives; and he did make a vital Supreme Court nomination, and other good judicial appointments, from what I hear. He&#039;s trying to close Guantanamo. There is some movement toward clean energy and disarmament, but more lip service than substance. Some of the stimulus measures did stave off a total collapse, but appeasing Wall Street is infuriating and just invites more of the same. He certainly should be pressured to dump Geithner and Summers and to keep from escalating Afghanistan, etc.  

It&#039;s a matter of emphasis to me. If we keep focusing only on Obama&#039;s failings we embolden the fanatic right, maybe even play into their hands rather than standing up against them. We want a more progressive president, yes, but what we are more likely to wind up with is fundamentalist fascism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all, Barb. Just that we shouldn&#8217;t lose sight of how much worse things could get if we allow the right wing fundamentalists to foment some kind of coup or revolution because we&#8217;re preoccupied with criticizing Obama.  I feel the system is rigged, and while he could and should (and we should push him to) be stronger and show more leadership on torture, climate change, Wall Street corruption, escalating wars especially, we know there are limits on what any president of this corporate-run government will be &#8220;allowed&#8221; to do. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree by a long stretch with those who say he is as bad as Bush. The federal agencies, which had grown incredibly corrupt under GWB, are finally starting to function and regulate a little bit, which directly affects people&#8217;s lives; and he did make a vital Supreme Court nomination, and other good judicial appointments, from what I hear. He&#8217;s trying to close Guantanamo. There is some movement toward clean energy and disarmament, but more lip service than substance. Some of the stimulus measures did stave off a total collapse, but appeasing Wall Street is infuriating and just invites more of the same. He certainly should be pressured to dump Geithner and Summers and to keep from escalating Afghanistan, etc.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of emphasis to me. If we keep focusing only on Obama&#8217;s failings we embolden the fanatic right, maybe even play into their hands rather than standing up against them. We want a more progressive president, yes, but what we are more likely to wind up with is fundamentalist fascism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Ahadi</title>
		<link>http://www.grass-roots-press.com/2009/11/17/trolling-for-assassins/comment-page-1/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb Ahadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grass-roots-press.com/?p=2434#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>Steve,
I just like to comment on this statement:  And right now, from where I sit, Obama’s failings, and they are many, can’t hold a candle to the ugliness lurking beneath the fundamentalist mantle.
1.  I am glad that you are also witness Obama&#039;s failings
2.  I agree that it can&#039;t hold a candle to the ugliness lurking beneath the fundamentalist mantle.
But, are you trying to tell us that we should never, ever critizing Obama for not standing up to his promises, because this criticism will support the rightwing fundamentalists??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
I just like to comment on this statement:  And right now, from where I sit, Obama’s failings, and they are many, can’t hold a candle to the ugliness lurking beneath the fundamentalist mantle.<br />
1.  I am glad that you are also witness Obama&#8217;s failings<br />
2.  I agree that it can&#8217;t hold a candle to the ugliness lurking beneath the fundamentalist mantle.<br />
But, are you trying to tell us that we should never, ever critizing Obama for not standing up to his promises, because this criticism will support the rightwing fundamentalists??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.270 seconds -->

